| Title |
Folivory versus florivory—adaptiveness of flower feeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00114-009-0615-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Babak Bandeili, Caroline Müller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 58 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#817
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,290
of 95,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.