↓ Skip to main content

Species-specific, pan-European diameter increment models based on data of 2.3 million trees

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Species-specific, pan-European diameter increment models based on data of 2.3 million trees
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40663-018-0133-3
Authors

Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Geerten M Hengeveld, Nanny Heidema, Esther Thürig, Brigitte Rohner, Giorgio Vacchiano, Jordi Vayreda, John Redmond, Jarosław Socha, Jonas Fridman, Stein Tomter, Heino Polley, Susana Barreiro, Gert-Jan Nabuurs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 28 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#94
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,236
of 343,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.