↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
The Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12016-015-8503-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joyce E. Yu, Robert Y. Lin

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a dramatic expression of systemic allergy. The lifetime prevalence of anaphylaxis is currently estimated at 0.05-2 % in the USA and ~3 % in Europe. Several population-specific studies have noted a rise in the incidence, particularly in the hospitalizations and ER visits due to anaphylaxis. The variable signs and symptoms that constitute the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis, the differences in diagnostic algorithms, and the limitations in the current coding systems have made summarizing epidemiologic data and comparing study results challenging. Nevertheless, across all studies, the most common triggers continue to be medications, food, and venom. Various risk factors for more severe reactions generally include older age, history of asthma, and having more comorbid diseases. Interesting seasonal, geographic, and latitude differences have been observed in anaphylaxis prevalence and incidence rates, suggesting a possible role of vitamin D and sun exposure in modifying anaphylaxis risk. While the incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis appear to be increasing in certain populations, the overall fatality rate remains relatively low.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Other 20 12%
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,981,137
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#61
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,223
of 270,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.