You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s87551 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elísio Costa, Anna Giardini, Magda Savin, Enrica Menditto, Elaine Lehane, Olga Laosa, Sergio Pecorelli, Alessandro Monaco, Alessandra Marengoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 691 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 684 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 13% |
| Researcher | 58 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 51 | 7% |
| Other | 115 | 17% |
| Unknown | 184 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 107 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 96 | 14% |
| Psychology | 33 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 91 | 13% |
| Unknown | 219 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,690,188
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#65
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,867
of 279,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.