You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biallelic loss of human CTNNA2, encoding αN-catenin, leads to ARP2/3 complex overactivity and disordered cortical neuronal migration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0166-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashleigh E. Schaffer, Martin W. Breuss, Ahmet Okay Caglayan, Nouriya Al-Sanaa, Hind Y. Al-Abdulwahed, Hande Kaymakçalan, Cahide Yılmaz, Maha S. Zaki, Rasim O. Rosti, Brett Copeland, Seung Tae Baek, Damir Musaev, Eric C. Scott, Tawfeg Ben-Omran, Ariana Kariminejad, Hulya Kayserili, Faezeh Mojahedi, Majdi Kara, Na Cai, Jennifer L. Silhavy, Seham Elsharif, Elif Fenercioglu, Bruce A. Barshop, Bulent Kara, Rengang Wang, Valentina Stanley, Kiely N. James, Rahul Nachnani, Aneesha Kalur, Hisham Megahed, Faruk Incecik, Sumita Danda, Yasemin Alanay, Eissa Faqeih, Gia Melikishvili, Lobna Mansour, Ian Miller, Biayna Sukhudyan, Jamel Chelly, William B. Dobyns, Kaya Bilguvar, Rami Abou Jamra, Murat Gunel, Joseph G. Gleeson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#701,461
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,317
of 7,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,895
of 341,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#36
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.