↓ Skip to main content

The letter height superiority illusion

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The letter height superiority illusion
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0753-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boris New, Karine Doré-Mazars, Céline Cavézian, Christophe Pallier, Julien Barra

Abstract

Letters are identified better when they are embedded within words rather than within pseudowords, a phenomenon known as the word superiority effect (Reicher in Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280, 1969). This effect is, inter alia, accounted for by the interactive-activation model (McClelland & Rumelhart in Psychological Review, 88, 375-407, 1981) through feedback from word to letter nodes. In this study, we investigated whether overactivation of features could lead to perceptual bias, wherein letters would be perceived as being taller than pseudoletters, or words would be perceived as being taller than pseudowords. In two experiments, we investigated the effects of letter and lexical status on the perception of size. Participants who had to compare the heights of letters and pseudoletters, or of words and pseudowords, indeed perceived the former stimuli as being taller than the latter. Possible alternative interpretations of this height superiority effect for letters and words are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 36%
Computer Science 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%