You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bioaccumulation and biological effects of cigarette litter in marine worms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/srep14119 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie L. Wright, Darren Rowe, Malcolm J. Reid, Kevin V. Thomas, Tamara S. Galloway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 16% |
Norway | 3 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 5% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Sweden | 2 | 3% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Georgia | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 50 | 79% |
Scientists | 9 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 15% |
Researcher | 26 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 15% |
Unknown | 37 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 49 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 16% |
Engineering | 9 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 5% |
Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 15% |
Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#282,015
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,263
of 141,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,561
of 281,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#38
of 2,168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.