↓ Skip to main content

Sunk Cost Effect in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Sunk Cost Effect in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3679-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junya Fujino, Shisei Tei, Takashi Itahashi, Yuta Aoki, Haruhisa Ohta, Chieko Kanai, Manabu Kubota, Ryu-ichiro Hashimoto, Motoaki Nakamura, Nobumasa Kato, Hidehiko Takahashi

Abstract

The sunk cost effect, an interesting and well-known decision bias, is pervasive in real life and has been studied in various disciplines. In this study, we modified a task exemplifying the sunk cost effect and used it to evaluate this behavior in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The control group exhibited a typical sunk cost effect in our task. We found that the sunk cost effect was lower in the ASD group than in the control group. The results agree with previous evidence of reduced sensitivity to context stimuli in individuals with ASD and extend this finding to the context of the sunk cost effect. Our findings are useful in addressing the practical implications on their socioeconomic behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,362,351
of 25,089,705 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#515
of 5,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,435
of 332,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,089,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.