↓ Skip to main content

Corporate Social ‘Irresponsibility’: Are Consumers’ Biases in Attribution of Blame Helping Companies in Product–Harm Crises Involving Hybrid Products?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Corporate Social ‘Irresponsibility’: Are Consumers’ Biases in Attribution of Blame Helping Companies in Product–Harm Crises Involving Hybrid Products?
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2258-9
Authors

Sergio W. Carvalho, Etayankara Muralidharan, Hari Bapuji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 34 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 52 44%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,800,225
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,596
of 2,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,468
of 228,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#30
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.