↓ Skip to main content

Chronic kidney disease and cause-specific hospitalisation: a matched cohort study using primary and secondary care patient data

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Chronic kidney disease and cause-specific hospitalisation: a matched cohort study using primary and secondary care patient data
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x697973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masao Iwagami, Ben Caplin, Liam Smeeth, Laurie A Tomlinson, Dorothea Nitsch

Abstract

Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with various outcomes, the burden of each condition for hospital admission is unknown. To quantify the association between CKD and cause-specific hospitalisation. A matched cohort study in primary care using Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for ≥3 months) and a comparison group of patients without known CKD (matched for age, sex, GP, and calendar time) were identified, 2004-2014. Outcomes were hospitalisations with 10 common conditions as the primary admission diagnosis: heart failure; urinary tract infection; pneumonia; acute kidney injury (AKI); myocardial infarction; cerebral infarction; gastrointestinal bleeding; hip fracture; venous thromboembolism; and intracranial bleeding. A difference in the incidence rate of first hospitalisation for each condition was estimated between matched patients with and without CKD. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate a relative risk for each outcome. In a cohort of 242 349 pairs of patients, with and without CKD, the rate difference was largest for heart failure at 6.6/1000 person-years (9.7/1000 versus 3.1/1000 person-years in patients with and without CKD, respectively), followed by urinary tract infection at 5.2, pneumonia at 4.4, and AKI at 4.1/1000 person-years. The relative risk was highest for AKI with a fully adjusted hazard ratio of 4.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.47 to 5.38, followed by heart failure with 1.66, 95% CI = 1.59 to 1.75. Hospitalisations for heart failure, infection, and AKI showed strong associations with CKD in absolute and(or) relative terms, suggesting targets for improved preventive care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,503,113
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,183
of 4,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,432
of 326,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#35
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.