↓ Skip to main content

Loss of Vestibular Ocular Reflex in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Loss of Vestibular Ocular Reflex in Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus
Published in
Neurocritical Care, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12028-018-0567-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer H. Kang, Aatif M. Husain, Joel C. Morgenlander

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) findings of generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with triphasic morphology were introduced as a metabolic phenomenon, but more recently have been associated with epileptic phenomenon. Resolution of EEG findings along with clinical improvement from treatment is diagnostic. The known causes of reversible, isolated loss of OVR include medication toxicity, lead exposure, and thiamine deficiency, but its association with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) has never been published. Medication induced loss of OVR resolves after a 24-hour washout period. We report a case of reversible, isolated loss of vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) associated with epileptic phenomenon. This is a case report of a single patient. A 74-year-old male with a history of complex partial seizures admitted for a pneumonectomy had a post-operative course complicated by two instances of coma, the latter associated with an isolated loss of VOR. EEG revealed GPDs with triphasic morphology initially interpreted as a metabolic phenomenon. The patient's mental status, exam and EEG findings improved after low dose infusion of propofol for tracheostomy, and he was eventually discharged at baseline neurological function. Due to this response, his coma, loss of VOR and EEG were later interpreted as a consequence of NCSE. The interpretation of GPDs with triphasic wave morphology range from metabolic phenomenon to NCSE. NCSE should be highly considered on the differential for encephalopathy regardless of the circumstances. NCSE may be a potential cause of reversible, isolated loss of the VOR and an AED trial in the appropriate clinical context should be considered. This is the first report of loss of VOR possibly associated with NCSE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#1,283
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,277
of 329,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.