↓ Skip to main content

On the relationship between conditional (CAR) and simultaneous (SAR) autoregressive models

Overview of attention for article published in Spatial Statistics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the relationship between conditional (CAR) and simultaneous (SAR) autoregressive models
Published in
Spatial Statistics, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.spasta.2018.04.006
Authors

Jay M. Ver Hoef, Ephraim M. Hanks, Mevin B. Hooten

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 35 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Spatial Statistics
#134
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,754
of 330,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spatial Statistics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.