↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Sensory Profile in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Sensory Profile in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3678-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zachary J. Williams, Michelle D. Failla, Katherine O. Gotham, Tiffany G. Woynaroski, Carissa Cascio

Abstract

The Short Sensory Profile (SSP) is one of the most commonly used measures of sensory features in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but psychometric studies in this population are limited. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we evaluated the structural validity of the SSP subscales in ASD children. Confirmatory factor models exhibited poor fit, and a follow-up exploratory factor analysis suggested a 9-factor structure that only replicated three of the seven original subscales. Secondary analyses suggest that while reliable, the SSP total score is substantially biased by individual differences on dimensions other than the general factor. Overall, our findings discourage the use of the SSP total score and most subscale scores in children with ASD. Implications for future research are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 53 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,792,365
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#734
of 5,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,638
of 301,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#21
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.