↓ Skip to main content

Valproate-induced hyperammonemia - uncovering an underlying inherited metabolic disorder: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Valproate-induced hyperammonemia - uncovering an underlying inherited metabolic disorder: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13256-018-1666-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaine Mehta, Sarrah Tayabali, Robin Lachmann

Abstract

Sodium valproate is a commonly used anticonvulsant. It is widely recognized that valproate can cause hyperammonemia, particularly in people with underlying liver disease. Patients with urea cycle disorders are genetically predisposed to this adverse event and can develop severe hyperammonemia if given valproate. This can occur even if liver functions tests and plasma concentration of valproate are normal, highlighting the importance of checking ammonia levels in any patient presenting with encephalopathy. Specific treatment for hyperammonemia must be implemented promptly. A 22-year-old white British man with a history of epilepsy post head trauma presented with subacute encephalopathy 4 weeks after the introduction of sodium valproate. His ammonia levels were not checked until 48 hours into his presentation and were found to be elevated. He initially responded to treatment of his hyperammonemia and the raised levels were attributed to sodium valproate. However, as his ammonia levels continued to rise, further investigation led to a diagnosis of ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency is the most common of the urea cycle disorders. This case highlights both the importance of checking ammonia levels early and considering the diagnosis of this X-linked disorder in patients with raised ammonia, as these have implications both for the patient's acute and further management, and for family screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#19,981,515
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,160
of 4,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,438
of 342,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#48
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,573 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.