↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a commercial spider venom peptide against spotted-wing Drosophila and interaction with adjuvants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pest Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of a commercial spider venom peptide against spotted-wing Drosophila and interaction with adjuvants
Published in
Journal of Pest Science, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10340-018-1016-7
Authors

Philip D. Fanning, Anthony VanWoerkom, John C. Wise, Rufus Isaacs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,289,229
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#479
of 626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,072
of 333,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.