↓ Skip to main content

Predictive Modeling of Neuroblastoma Growth Dynamics in Xenograft Model After Bevacizumab Anti-VEGF Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Predictive Modeling of Neuroblastoma Growth Dynamics in Xenograft Model After Bevacizumab Anti-VEGF Therapy
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11538-018-0441-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yixuan He, Anita Kodali, Dorothy I. Wallace

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is the leading cause of cancer death in young children. Although treatment for neuroblastoma has improved, the 5-year survival rate of patients still remains less than half. Recent studies have indicated that bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF drug used in treatment of several other cancer types, may be effective for treating neuroblastoma as well. However, its effect on neuroblastoma has not been well characterized. While traditional experiments are costly and time-consuming, mathematical models are capable of simulating complex systems quickly and inexpensively. In this study, we present a model of vascular tumor growth of neuroblastoma IMR-32 that is complex enough to replicate experimental data across a range of tumor cell properties measured in a suite of in vitro and in vivo experiments. The model provides quantitative insight into tumor vasculature, predicting a linear relationship between vasculature and tumor volume. The tumor growth model was coupled with known pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the VEGF blocker bevacizumab to study its effect on neuroblastoma growth dynamics. The results of our model suggest that total administered bevacizumab concentration per week, as opposed to dosage regimen, is the major determining factor in tumor suppression. Our model also establishes an exponentially decreasing relationship between administered bevacizumab concentration and tumor growth rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Mathematics 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#13,622,705
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#546
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,539
of 328,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.