↓ Skip to main content

Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: a multidisciplinary practical guidance

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: a multidisciplinary practical guidance
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4041-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Mebazaa, H. Tolppanen, C. Mueller, J. Lassus, S. DiSomma, G. Baksyte, M. Cecconi, D. J. Choi, A. Cohen Solal, M. Christ, J. Masip, M. Arrigo, S. Nouira, D. Ojji, F. Peacock, M. Richards, N. Sato, K. Sliwa, J. Spinar, H. Thiele, M. B. Yilmaz, J. Januzzi

Abstract

Acute heart failure (AHF) causes high burden of mortality, morbidity, and repeated hospitalizations worldwide. This guidance paper describes the tailored treatment approaches of different clinical scenarios of AHF and CS, focusing on the needs of professionals working in intensive care settings. Tissue congestion and hypoperfusion are the two leading mechanisms of end-organ injury and dysfunction, which are associated with worse outcome in AHF. Diagnosis of AHF is based on clinical assessment, measurement of natriuretic peptides, and imaging modalities. Simultaneously, emphasis should be given in rapidly identifying the underlying trigger of AHF and assessing severity of AHF, as well as in recognizing end-organ injuries. Early initiation of effective treatment is associated with superior outcomes. Oxygen, diuretics, and vasodilators are the key therapies for the initial treatment of AHF. In case of respiratory distress, non-invasive ventilation with pressure support should be promptly started. In patients with severe forms of AHF with cardiogenic shock (CS), inotropes are recommended to achieve hemodynamic stability and restore tissue perfusion. In refractory CS, when hemodynamic stabilization is not achieved, the use of mechanical support with assist devices should be considered early, before the development of irreversible end-organ injuries. A multidisciplinary approach along the entire patient journey from pre-hospital care to hospital discharge is needed to ensure early recognition, risk stratification, and the benefit of available therapies. Medical management should be planned according to the underlying mechanisms of various clinical scenarios of AHF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 403 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 14%
Other 51 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Student > Master 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 33 8%
Other 86 21%
Unknown 93 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 234 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Engineering 6 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 1%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 104 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,683
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,571
of 282,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#15
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.