| Title |
Responding to misinformation and criticisms regarding United States cat predation estimates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-018-1796-y |
| Authors |
Scott R. Loss, Tom Will, Travis Longcore, Peter P. Marra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 30% |
| Canada | 14 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 77 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 108 | 63% |
| Scientists | 51 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#302,169
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#21
of 2,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,421
of 340,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.