↓ Skip to main content

Nanomaterial Engineering and Property Studies in a Transmission Electron Microscope

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanomaterial Engineering and Property Studies in a Transmission Electron Microscope
Published in
Advanced Materials, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/adma.201102579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitri Golberg, Pedro M.F.J. Costa, Ming‐Sheng Wang, Xianlong Wei, Dai‐Ming Tang, Zhi Xu, Yang Huang, Ujjal K. Gautam, Baodan Liu, Haibo Zeng, Naoyki Kawamoto, Chunyi Zhi, Masanori Mitome, Yoshio Bando

Abstract

Modern methods of in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) allow one to not only manipulate with a nanoscale object at the nanometer-range precision but also to get deep insights into its physical and chemical statuses. Dedicated TEM holders combining the capabilities of a conventional high-resolution TEM instrument and atomic force -, and/or scanning tunneling microscopy probes become the powerful tools in nanomaterials analysis. This progress report highlights the past, present and future of these exciting methods based on the extensive authors endeavors over the last five years. The objects of interest are diverse. They include carbon, boron nitride and other inorganic one- and two-dimensional nanoscale materials, e.g., nanotubes, nanowires and nanosheets. The key point of all experiments discussed is that the mechanical and electrical transport data are acquired on an individual nanostructure level under ultimately high spatial, temporal and energy resolution achievable in TEM, and thus can directly be linked to morphological, structural and chemical peculiarities of a given nanomaterial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
India 1 1%
Unknown 93 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 30%
Researcher 18 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 27 27%
Physics and Astronomy 16 16%
Engineering 14 14%
Chemistry 14 14%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2011.
All research outputs
#16,597,003
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#12,217
of 16,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,496
of 139,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#115
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.