↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetric cell division during T cell development controls downstream fate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Asymmetric cell division during T cell development controls downstream fate
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, September 2015
DOI 10.1083/jcb.201502053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Pham, Raz Shimoni, Mirren Charnley, Mandy J. Ludford-Menting, Edwin D. Hawkins, Kelly Ramsbottom, Jane Oliaro, David Izon, Stephen B. Ting, Joseph Reynolds, Grant Lythe, Carmen Molina-Paris, Heather Melichar, Ellen Robey, Patrick O. Humbert, Min Gu, Sarah M. Russell

Abstract

During mammalian T cell development, the requirement for expansion of many individual T cell clones, rather than merely expansion of the entire T cell population, suggests a possible role for asymmetric cell division (ACD). We show that ACD of developing T cells controls cell fate through differential inheritance of cell fate determinants Numb and α-Adaptin. ACD occurs specifically during the β-selection stage of T cell development, and subsequent divisions are predominantly symmetric. ACD is controlled by interaction with stromal cells and chemokine receptor signaling and uses a conserved network of polarity regulators. The disruption of polarity by deletion of the polarity regulator, Scribble, or the altered inheritance of fate determinants impacts subsequent fate decisions to influence the numbers of DN4 cells arising after the β-selection checkpoint. These findings indicate that ACD enables the thymic microenvironment to orchestrate fate decisions related to differentiation and self-renewal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,941,392
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#11,436
of 11,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,019
of 269,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#108
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.