↓ Skip to main content

Serum free light chain measurements to reduce 24‐h urine monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma with measurable urine monoclonal protein

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Hematology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum free light chain measurements to reduce 24‐h urine monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma with measurable urine monoclonal protein
Published in
American Journal of Hematology, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/ajh.25215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcella Tschautscher, Vincent Rajkumar, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Lacy, Morie Gertz, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Lisa Hwa, Amie Fonder, Miriam Hobbs, Suzanne Hayman, Stephen Zeldenrust, John Lust, Stephen Russell, Nelson Leung, Pranshant Kapoor, Ronald Go, Yi Lin, Wilson Gonsalves, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Rahma Warsame, Robert Kyle, Shaji Kumar

Abstract

Detection of myeloma progression (PD) relies on serial 24-hr urinary M protein measurements in patients without measurable serum M spike. We examined whether serial dFLC levels could be used as a surrogate for serial 24-hr urine M protein measurements in monitoring for PD in patients with baseline measurable urine M protein. We studied 122 patients who had serial measurement of urine M protein and serum FLC and had demonstrated PD. The median increase in dFLC with progression as defined by urine M spike was 110% (IQR: 55-312) and median absolute increase was 74mg/dL; while 89% of patients had dFLC increase>25%, 94% had absolute increase in dFLC>10mg/dL, and 98% met at least one of these two criteria at PD. In patients with baseline measurable sFLC (n=118), 89% had increase in dFLC>25%, 97% had dFLC increase of >10 mg/dL, and 98% had one of the two. We conclude that serial dFLC assessments can be used in place of serial 24-hour urine protein assessments during myeloma surveillance to monitor for PD. Once patients have an absolute increase in dFLC of >10 mg/dL from the nadir, a 24-hour urine collection can then be assessed to document PD as per the IMWG criteria. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,207,357
of 25,253,876 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hematology
#575
of 3,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,460
of 336,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hematology
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,253,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.