↓ Skip to main content

Health Coaching in the Teamlet Model: A Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Health Coaching in the Teamlet Model: A Case Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1508-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Ngo, Hali Hammer, Thomas Bodenheimer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Psychology 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,223,569
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,262
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,507
of 99,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#42
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.