↓ Skip to main content

Randomized trial of constraint‐induced movement therapy and bimanual training on activity outcomes for children with congenital hemiplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized trial of constraint‐induced movement therapy and bimanual training on activity outcomes for children with congenital hemiplegia
Published in
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03859.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

LEANNE SAKZEWSKI, JENNY ZIVIANI, DAVID F ABBOTT, RICHARD A L MACDONELL, GRAEME D JACKSON, ROSLYN N BOYD

Abstract

To determine if constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is more effective than bimanual training (BIM) in improving upper limb activity outcomes for children with congenital hemiplegia in a matched-pairs randomized trial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 287 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 21%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Researcher 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 73 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 20%
Neuroscience 16 5%
Sports and Recreations 16 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 82 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#1,745
of 4,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,741
of 119,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.