You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing for multiple species and multiple values: tradeoffs inherent in ecosystem‐based fisheries management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00132.x |
| Authors |
Julie B. Kellner, James N. Sanchirico, Alan Hastings, Peter J. Mumby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 8% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 31% |
| Researcher | 41 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 52 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#936
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,813
of 182,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.