You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Informed opportunism for conservation planning in the Solomon Islands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00140.x |
| Authors |
Edward T. Game, Geoffrey Lipsett‐Moore, Richard Hamilton, Nate Peterson, Jimmy Kereseka, William Atu, Matthew Watts, Hugh Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 182 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 85 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2011.
All research outputs
#18,300,116
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#962
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,568
of 95,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.