You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
2018 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph E. Bavaria, Carl L. Tommaso, Ralph G. Brindis, John D. Carroll, G. Michael Deeb, Ted E. Feldman, Thomas G. Gleason, Eric M. Horlick, Clifford J. Kavinsky, Dharam J. Kumbhani, D. Craig Miller, A. Allen Seals, David M. Shahian, Richard J. Shemin, Thoralf M. Sundt, Vinod H. Thourani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 30% |
Spain | 12 | 20% |
Colombia | 3 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 43 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 13% |
Scientists | 7 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 36 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#383,065
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#904
of 16,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,269
of 340,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#29
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.