↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Differential Treatment Mechanisms in Mindfulness Meditation and Progressive Muscle Relaxation

Overview of attention for article published in Mindfulness, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Differential Treatment Mechanisms in Mindfulness Meditation and Progressive Muscle Relaxation
Published in
Mindfulness, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12671-017-0876-x
Authors

Liya Gao, Joshua Curtiss, Xinghua Liu, Stefan G. Hofmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,830,887
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Mindfulness
#501
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,130
of 443,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mindfulness
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.