↓ Skip to main content

A survey of tandem repeat instabilities and associated gene expression changes in 35 colorectal cancers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A survey of tandem repeat instabilities and associated gene expression changes in 35 colorectal cancers
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1902-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tugce Bilgin Sonay, Malamati Koletou, Andreas Wagner

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a major contributor to cancer morbidity and mortality. Tandem repeat instability and its effect on cancer phenotypes remain so far poorly studied on a genome-wide scale. Here we analyze the genomes of 35 colorectal tumors and their matched normal (healthy) tissues for two types of tandem repeat instability, de-novo repeat gain or loss and repeat copy number variation. Specifically, we study for the first time genome-wide repeat instability in the promoters and exons of 18,439 genes, and examine the association of repeat instability with genome-scale gene expression levels. We find that tumors with a microsatellite instable (MSI) phenotype are enriched in genes with repeat instability, and that tumor genomes have significantly more genes with repeat instability compared to healthy tissues. Genes in tumor genomes with repeat instability in their promoters are significantly less expressed and show slightly higher levels of methylation. Genes in well-studied cancer-associated signaling pathways also contain significantly more unstable repeats in tumor genomes. Genes with such unstable repeats in the tumor-suppressor p53 pathway have lower expression levels, whereas genes with repeat instability in the MAPK and Wnt signaling pathways are expressed at higher levels, consistent with the oncogenic role they play in cancer. Our results suggest that repeat instability in gene promoters and associated differential gene expression may play an important role in colorectal tumors, which is a first step towards the development of more effective molecular diagnostic approaches centered on repeat instability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,346,908
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,694
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,533
of 245,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#237
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.