| Title |
Systematic review of agents for the management of gastrointestinal mucositis in cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-012-1644-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel J. Gibson, Dorothy M. K. Keefe, Rajesh V. Lalla, Emma Bateman, Nicole Blijlevens, Margot Fijlstra, Emily E. King, Andrea M. Stringer, Walter J. F. M. van der Velden, Roger Yazbeck, Sharon Elad, Joanne M. Bowen, For The Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,843,491
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#263
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,859
of 181,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.