↓ Skip to main content

Addressing the evolution of automated user behaviour patterns by runtime model interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Software and Systems Modeling, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Addressing the evolution of automated user behaviour patterns by runtime model interpretation
Published in
Software and Systems Modeling, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10270-013-0371-3
Authors

Estefanía Serral, Pedro Valderas, Vicente Pelechano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
France 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 69%
Engineering 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Software and Systems Modeling
#663
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,750
of 199,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software and Systems Modeling
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.