| Title |
Silicon: A requirement in bone formation independent of vitamin D1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, December 1981
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02409409 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edith M. Carlisle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 34 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,200,109
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#208
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#966
of 30,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.