↓ Skip to main content

Medial temporal lobe activity associated with the successful retrieval of destination memory

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Medial temporal lobe activity associated with the successful retrieval of destination memory
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00221-015-4415-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shunji Mugikura, Nobuhito Abe, Ayahito Ito, Iori Kawasaki, Aya Ueno, Shoki Takahashi, Toshikatsu Fujii

Abstract

Destination memory is the process of remembering to whom we tell particular things. Although recent behavioral studies have clarified the cognitive nature of destination memory, the neural mechanisms underlying destination memory retrieval remain unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine whether the medial temporal lobe (MTL), a structure that has been implicated in recollection-based memory, is activated during the successful retrieval of destination information. During a study phase before fMRI scanning, the subjects told a series of facts to either a woman or a man. During fMRI scanning, the subjects were asked to judge whether each fact presented was old or new, and if they judged it as old, to indicate, including a confidence rating (high or low), whether the subjects had told that fact to either a man or a woman. We found that successful destination retrieval, when compared to failed destination retrieval, was associated with increased activity in the parahippocampal gyrus. We also found that the confidence level (high vs. low) for destination memory retrieval was associated with increased activity in another (posterior) region of the parahippocampal gyrus. The present study suggests that the successful retrieval of destination information depends highly on MTL-mediated recollection processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Student > Master 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 35%
Neuroscience 5 25%
Computer Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,923,772
of 24,171,551 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#745
of 3,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,049
of 249,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#14
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,551 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.