↓ Skip to main content

Leptin stimulates tissue rat mast cell pro-inflammatory activity and migratory response

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Leptin stimulates tissue rat mast cell pro-inflammatory activity and migratory response
Published in
Inflammation Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00011-018-1171-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina Żelechowska, Justyna Agier, Sylwia Różalska, Magdalena Wiktorska, Ewa Brzezińska-Błaszczyk

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether leptin, a member of the adipocytokines involved in immune and inflammatory response regulation, may influence some aspects of mast cell biology. Experiments were done in vitro on fully mature tissue rat mast cells isolated from the peritoneal cavity, and leptin was used at concentrations 0.001-100 ng/ml. The effect of leptin on mast cell degranulation (histamine release assay), intracellular Ca2+ level (fluorimetry), pro-inflammatory mediator release (ELISA technique), surface receptor expression (flow cytometry and confocal microscopy), and migration (Boyden microchamber assay) was estimated. Leptin was found to stimulate mast cells to degranulation and histamine release. It induced the intracellular Ca2+ increase, as well. In response to leptin stimulation, mast cells generated and released cysLTs and chemokine CCL3. Leptin-induced upregulation of CYSLTR1 and CYSLTR2 surface expression was observed. Moreover, this adipocytokine stimulated mast cells to migratory response, even in the absence of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Our observations clearly documented that leptin promotes the pro-inflammatory activity of mast cells, and it thereby engages these cells in the inflammatory processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 26%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#19,012,063
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#716
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,812
of 297,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.