| Title |
Fake news and indifference to scientific fact: President Trump’s confused tweets on global warming, climate change and weather
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-018-2847-y |
| Authors |
David E. Allen, Michael McAleer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 26% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,060,251
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,226
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,700
of 327,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#31
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.