↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Arousal and Implicit and Explicit Determinants of Condom Use Intentions

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Arousal and Implicit and Explicit Determinants of Condom Use Intentions
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-018-1257-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenny Wolfs, Arjan E. R. Bos, Fraukje E. F. Mevissen, Gjalt-Jorn Y. Peters, Jacques J. D. M. van Lankveld

Abstract

Being sexually aroused may be an important risk factor contributing to sexual decision making. Dual-process cognitive models, such as the reflective-impulsive model of Strack and Deutsch (2004), could be used to explain the effect of sexual arousal on intentions to use a condom. In this study, we investigated whether explicit and implicit attitudes toward condom use can predict intentions to use a condom when participants are sexually aroused and not aroused. In a within-subjects experimental design, male participants (N = 27) watched both a neutral and an erotic movie clip in counterbalanced order. After each clip, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their intentions to use a condom and explicit condom attitudes, followed by a wanting Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 2003) and a liking IAT to assess their implicit attitudes to unsafe sex. In concordance with the reflective-impulsive model, we found that when participants were not sexually aroused, their intentions to use a condom were solely predicted by their explicit attitudes. However, when they were sexually aroused, intentions to use a condom were predicted by both explicit and implicit attitudes toward condom use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 23%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,136,687
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,776
of 3,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,826
of 326,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#47
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.