↓ Skip to main content

Using Whole-Exome Sequencing to Identify Genetic Markers for Carboplatin and Gemcitabine-Induced Toxicities

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Whole-Exome Sequencing to Identify Genetic Markers for Carboplatin and Gemcitabine-Induced Toxicities
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2016
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrik Gréen, Johanna Hasmats, Ilya Kupershmidt, Daniel Edsgärd, Luigi de Petris, Rolf Lewensohn, Fiona Blackhall, Svante Vikingsson, Benjamin Besse, Andrea Lindgren, Eva Brandén, Hirsh Koyi, Curt Peterson, Joakim Lundeberg

Abstract

Chemotherapies are associated with significant inter-individual variability in therapeutic effect and adverse drug reactions. In lung cancer, the use of gemcitabine and carboplatin induces grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression in about a quarter of the patients, while an equal fraction of patients are basically unaffected in terms of myelosuppressive side effects. We therefore set out to identify genetic markers for gemcitabine/carboplatin-induced myelosuppression. We exome sequenced 32 patients that suffered extremely high neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (grade 3-4 after first chemotherapy cycle) or were virtually unaffected (grade 0-1). The genetic differences/polymorphism between the groups were compared using six different bioinformatics strategies: 1) whole-exome non-synonymous single nucleotide variants association analysis, 2) deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, 3) analysis of genes selected by a priori biological knowledge, 4) analysis of genes selected from gene expression meta-analysis of toxicity datasets, 5) Ingenuity-Pathway Analysis, and 6) FunCoup network enrichment analysis. A total of 53 genetic variants that differed among these groups were validated in an additional 291 patients and were correlated to the patients' myelosuppression. In the validation, we identified rs1453542 in OR4D6 (p=0.0008, OR = 5.2, 95%CI=1.8-18) as a marker for gemcitabine/carboplatin-induced neutropenia and rs5925720 in DDX53 (p=0.0015, OR=0.36,95%CI=0.17-0.71) as a marker for thrombocytopenia. Patients homozygous for the minor allele of rs1453542 had a higher risk of neutropenia, and for rs5925720 the minor allele was associated with a lower risk for thrombocytopenia. We have identified two new genetic markers with the potential to predict myelosuppression induced by gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,238,195
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#9,926
of 12,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,977
of 395,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#107
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.