↓ Skip to main content

Pesticide-Poisoned Patients: Can They Be Used as Potential Organ Donors?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Toxicology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Pesticide-Poisoned Patients: Can They Be Used as Potential Organ Donors?
Published in
Journal of Medical Toxicology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13181-018-0673-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Umesh Mistry, Paul I. Dargan, David M. Wood

Abstract

The gap between the number of patients on transplant waiting lists and patients receiving transplants is growing. Use of organs from donors who have died following pesticide exposure remains controversial. This study reviews the literature related to transplantation from this group. A literature search was undertaken on PubMed using the following keywords: 'insecticide', 'pesticide', 'rodenticide', 'organophosphate', 'carbamate', 'paraquat', 'poisoning', 'toxicity', 'overdose', 'intoxication', 'ingestion', 'organ donation or procurement', 'transplant', 'allograft transplant', and 'expanded criteria organ donation'; 21 specific pesticides/insecticides were also added to the search; the indexes for EAPCCT/NACCT meeting abstracts 2008-2017 were also searched. Identified publications were reviewed and if described human donation/transplantation of ≥ 1 solid organ(s), the following was extracted: (i) compound(s) ingested; (ii) donor demographics; (iii) organ(s) transplanted; and (iv) graft function at follow-up. Ten papers were identified describing 20 fatalities (1999-2017) related to the following pesticide exposures: organophosphate, 8 cases; aldicarb, 4; paraquat, 3; parathion, 1; malathion, 1; carbofuran/carbamate, 1; carbamate, 1; and brodifacoum, 1 and no further cases were identified from EAPCCT/NACCT abstracts. Donors were aged 12-50 (25.9 ± 11.9) years. Forty-four organs were transplanted: 28 kidneys, 7 livers, 6 corneas, and 3 hearts. Forty recipients had outcome reported: 3 (7.5%) patients died, 3 (7.5%) had graft failure/dysfunction and 34 (85.0%) had good graft function. Overall survival with good function was 96%, 71%, 83%, and 67% for kidneys, livers, corneas and hearts respectively. Review of the published literature suggests that solid organ donation following exposure to a pesticide is associated with good short-to-medium-term graft organ function following transplantation, particularly for transplanted kidneys and corneas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,622,705
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#501
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,177
of 326,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.