↓ Skip to main content

Soil Enzymatic Activities as Influenced by Lead and Nickel Concentrations in a Vertisol of Central India

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Soil Enzymatic Activities as Influenced by Lead and Nickel Concentrations in a Vertisol of Central India
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00128-018-2402-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. L. Dotaniya, J. S. Pipalde

Abstract

A pot-culture was conducted in Completely Randomized Design with three replicates to study the effect of Pb and Ni on enzymatic activities in a Vertisols. Results indicated that increasing in the levels of Pb from 0, 100, 150 and 300 mg kg-1 soil significantly reduced the dehydrogenase activity (DHA) 38.9, 32.1, 30.9, 18.1 µg triphenylformazan g-1 soil 24 h-1; acid phosphatase activities 73, 61, 58, 55 µg PNP g-1 soil h-1 and alkaline phosphatase activities 80.7, 69.4, 66.2 and 64.0 µg PNP g-1 soil h-1, respectively. Application of Ni up to 100 mg kg-1 had significantly improved the soil enzymatic activities and thereafter there was no such change up to the highest level (300 mg Ni kg-1). Among soil enzymatic activities, DHA was more sensitive to Pb application. The findings generated through this study can be useful for managing waste water for safe disposal as well as sustainable crop production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 12%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#3,090
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,231
of 332,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.