| Title |
Analytical results for the material of the Chelyabinsk meteorite
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geochemistry International, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s0016702913070100 |
| Authors |
E. M. Galimov, V. P. Kolotov, M. A. Nazarov, Yu. A. Kostitsyn, I. V. Kubrakova, N. N. Kononkova, I. A. Roshchina, V. A. Alexeev, L. L. Kashkarov, D. D. Badyukov, V. S. Sevast’yanov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Geochemistry International
#4
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,156
of 213,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemistry International
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them