↓ Skip to main content

Identifying cost-effective invasive species control to enhance endangered species populations in the Grand Canyon, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying cost-effective invasive species control to enhance endangered species populations in the Grand Canyon, USA
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.032
Authors

Lucas S. Bair, Charles B. Yackulic, Michael R. Springborn, Matthew N. Reimer, Craig A. Bond, Lewis G. Coggins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 33%
Environmental Science 11 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,021,897
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,176
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,570
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#55
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.