↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a Child Abuse Primary Prevention Strategy for New Mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Impact of a Child Abuse Primary Prevention Strategy for New Mothers
Published in
Prevention Science, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11121-018-0925-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kay M. G. O’Neill, Fallon Cluxton-Keller, Lori Burrell, Sarah Shea Crowne, Anne Duggan

Abstract

First Steps (FS) is a brief obstetrics-based primary prevention strategy that aims to strengthen protective factors to prevent child maltreatment. This randomized controlled trial assessed how well FS services aligned with family interests and needs, how FS providers used communication strategies to build partnership with mothers, and the impact of FS on mothers' parenting knowledge in core content areas and access to services. Mothers completed a baseline survey and were randomly assigned to FS and control conditions (n = 374 and 375, respectively). The parenting education services provided to mothers were assessed by independent participant report immediately postintervention for the full FS group and by analysis of audio-recordings of the FS encounter for a subsample (n = 150). Outcomes were measured at 4 months via maternal survey. Compared to controls at follow-up, FS mothers had significantly higher knowledge scores in some areas but similar access to needed services. Few mothers lacked access to most services at baseline, and FS content was similar to that provided by other hospital personnel. FS providers' communication style promoted rapport, but providers did not tailor content to mothers' educational and service access needs. Implications of the findings for similar services are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 30 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 32 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#930
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,186
of 326,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.