↓ Skip to main content

Exome Chip Analysis Identifies Low-Frequency and Rare Variants in MRPL38 for White Matter Hyperintensities on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exome Chip Analysis Identifies Low-Frequency and Rare Variants in MRPL38 for White Matter Hyperintensities on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published in
Stroke, August 2018
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.118.020689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueqiu Jian, Claudia L. Satizabal, Albert V. Smith, Katharina Wittfeld, Joshua C. Bis, Jennifer A. Smith, Fang-Chi Hsu, Kwangsik Nho, Edith Hofer, Saskia P. Hagenaars, Paul A. Nyquist, Aniket Mishra, Hieab H.H. Adams, Shuo Li, Alexander Teumer, Wei Zhao, Barry I. Freedman, Yasaman Saba, Lisa R. Yanek, Ganesh Chauhan, Mark A. van Buchem, Mary Cushman, Natalie A. Royle, R. Nick Bryan, Wiro J. Niessen, Beverly G. Windham, Anita L. DeStefano, Mohamad Habes, Susan R. Heckbert, Nicholette D. Palmer, Cora E. Lewis, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Pauline Maillard, Rasika A. Mathias, Georg Homuth, Maria del C. Valdés-Hernández, Jasmin Divers, Alexa S. Beiser, Sönke Langner, Kenneth M. Rice, Mark E. Bastin, Qiong Yang, Joseph A. Maldjian, John M. Starr, Stephen Sidney, Shannon L. Risacher, André G. Uitterlinden, Vilmundur G. Gudnason, Matthias Nauck, Jerome I. Rotter, Pamela J. Schreiner, Eric Boerwinkle, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Bernard Mazoyer, Bettina von Sarnowski, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Daniel Levy, Sigurdur Sigurdsson, Meike W. Vernooij, Stephen T. Turner, Reinhold Schmidt, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Bruce M. Psaty, Thomas H. Mosley, Charles S. DeCarli, Andrew J. Saykin, Donald W. Bowden, Diane M. Becker, Ian J. Deary, Helena Schmidt, Sharon L.R. Kardia, M. Arfan Ikram, Stéphanie Debette, Hans J. Grabe, W.T. Longstreth, Sudha Seshadri, Lenore J. Launer, Myriam Fornage

Abstract

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain magnetic resonance imaging are typical signs of cerebral small vessel disease and may indicate various preclinical, age-related neurological disorders, such as stroke. Though WMH are highly heritable, known common variants explain a small proportion of the WMH variance. The contribution of low-frequency/rare coding variants to WMH burden has not been explored. In the discovery sample we recruited 20 719 stroke/dementia-free adults from 13 population-based cohort studies within the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium, among which 17 790 were of European ancestry and 2929 of African ancestry. We genotyped these participants at ≈250 000 mostly exonic variants with Illumina HumanExome BeadChip arrays. We performed ethnicity-specific linear regression on rank-normalized WMH in each study separately, which were then combined in meta-analyses to test for association with single variants and genes aggregating the effects of putatively functional low-frequency/rare variants. We then sought replication of the top findings in 1192 adults (European ancestry) with whole exome/genome sequencing data from 2 independent studies. At 17q25, we confirmed the association of multiple common variants in TRIM65, FBF1, and ACOX1 (P<6×10-7). We also identified a novel association with 2 low-frequency nonsynonymous variants in MRPL38 (lead, rs34136221; PEA=4.5×10-8) partially independent of known common signal (PEA(conditional)=1.4×10-3). We further identified a locus at 2q33 containing common variants in NBEAL1, CARF, and WDR12 (lead, rs2351524; Pall=1.9×10-10). Although our novel findings were not replicated because of limited power and possible differences in study design, meta-analysis of the discovery and replication samples yielded stronger association for the 2 low-frequency MRPL38 variants (Prs34136221=2.8×10-8). Both common and low-frequency/rare functional variants influence WMH. Larger replication and experimental follow-up are essential to confirm our findings and uncover the biological causal mechanisms of age-related WMH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,142,662
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#10,150
of 11,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,708
of 331,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#128
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.