↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic management of incidental gallbladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic management of incidental gallbladder cancer
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6173-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xabier de Aretxabala, Federico Oppliger, Nicolas Solano, Guillermo Rencoret, Marcelo Vivanco, Daniel Carvajal, Juan Hepp, Ivan Roa

Abstract

The laparoscopic cholecystectomy has allowed the detection of an increasing number of incidental gallbladder cancers (IGBC). Although laparoscopy is employed in the management of a variety of abdominal tumors, its use in gallbladder cancer is reduced and controversial. This study analyzes the role of laparoscopy in gallbladder cancer with the focus in IGBC. We evaluated our prospective series of 51 patients with an IGBC who were treated by laparoscopy between 2006 and 2016 at the Clinica Alemana in Santiago, Chile. The series comprised 7 men and 44 women. Age ranged from 43 to 76 years (mean age 60). Regarding wall involvement, 29 patients had a T2 tumor, which was the most common. 8 and 14 patients had T1b and T3 tumors, respectively. Of the patients, 17 underwent only laparoscopic exploration. This was due to the presence tumor dissemination not being observed in the preoperative staging. 10 patients had to be converted to complete the resection, whereas 24 patients were laparoscopically resected. The quality of the resected material was not different between those who were converted and those who were treated by laparoscopy. In the laparoscopic group, the average number of harvested lymph nodes was 7.9, not statistically different from the converted group. The mean of hospital stay in the laparoscopic group (4.3 days) was significantly lower than the converted group. Laparoscopy has been shown to be a safe and feasible method for the management of IGBC. This method not only allows for a complete exploration, identifying a previously unseen residual tumor, but also makes it possible to accomplish the same oncology objectives as the open procedure. Therefore, laparoscopy should be considered a valid alternative in the management of IGBC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Librarian 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,802
of 6,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,009
of 328,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#108
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.