↓ Skip to main content

Roles and clinical implications of microRNAs in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cellular Physiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roles and clinical implications of microRNAs in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Journal of Cellular Physiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1002/jcp.26290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Ultimo, Alberto M. Martelli, Giorgio Zauli, Marco Vitale, George A. Calin, Luca M. Neri

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small noncoding RNAs which regulate the expression of target genes by binding to messenger RNAs. miRNAs play a role in various biological processes, including proliferation, apoptosis and tumorigenesis. Dysregulation of miRNAs is implicated in invasion and metastasis in several human cancer types, and leukemia is not an exception. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is an hematological malignancy characterized by the proliferation of early lymphoid precursors that replace normal hematopoietic cells of the bone marrow. The expression profiling of miRNAs in ALL could be used for the classification of the disease establishing specific diagnoses and offering prognostic values in the near future. The correlation of miRNAs dysregulation and biology of ALL demonstrates that specific miRNA may be a potential therapy target. In this review we have focused our attention on the correlations between ALL and miRNAs, their link with signaling pathways and transcription factors in the disease and miRNA targeting therapeutic strategies with their advantages and potential use in clinical applications. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,247,189
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cellular Physiology
#312
of 5,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,587
of 330,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cellular Physiology
#8
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.