Title |
Patients’ Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients’ Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Genetic Counseling, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10897-015-9873-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roy Gilbar, Stavit Shalev, Ronen Spiegel, Elon Pras, Michal Berkenstadt, Michal Sagi, Adi Ben‐Yehuda, Pnina Mor, Shlomit Perry, Tzipora Falik Zaccai, Zvi Borochowitz, Sivia Barnoy |
Abstract |
Many factors predict the intention to disclose genetic information to relatives. The article examines the impact of patients' socio-demographic factors on their intention to disclose genetic testing results to their relatives. Data were collected in eight genetic clinics in Israel. Patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire after counseling. A convenience sample of 564 participants who visited these clinics was collected for a response rate of 85 %. Of them, 282 participants came for susceptibility testing for hereditary cancers (cancer group), and 282 for genetic screening tests (prenatal group). In the cancer group, being secular and having more years of education correlated positively with the intention to disclose test results to relatives. In the prenatal group, being married and female correlated positively with the intention to disclose. In the cancer group, being religious and with less years of education correlated positively with the view that the clinician should deliver the results to the family. In the prenatal group, being male and unmarried correlated positively with this belief. In both groups, being of young age correlated with the perception that genetic information is private. Varied sociodemographic factors affect the intention to inform family members. Thus, knowing the social background of patients will shed light on people's attitudes to genetic information and will help clinicians provide effective counseling in discussions with patients about the implications of test results for relatives. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
Psychology | 10 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |