You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From static connectivity modelling to scenario-based planning at local and regional scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Nature Conservation, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.003 |
| Authors |
Alex Mark Lechner, Rebecca M.B. Harris, Veronica Doerr, Erik Doerr, Michael Drielsma, Edward C. Lefroy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Nature Conservation
#508
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,992
of 294,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Nature Conservation
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.