↓ Skip to main content

A Baby Step–Giant Step Roadmap Algorithm for General Algebraic Sets

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Computational Mathematics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
A Baby Step–Giant Step Roadmap Algorithm for General Algebraic Sets
Published in
Foundations of Computational Mathematics, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10208-014-9212-1
Authors

S. Basu, M.-F. Roy, M. Safey El Din, É. Schost

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 38%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,346,908
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Computational Mathematics
#83
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,677
of 260,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Computational Mathematics
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.