| Title |
Spatial and temporal analysis of a fatal landslide inventory in China from 1950 to 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-018-1037-6 |
| Authors |
Qigen Lin, Ying Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 21% |
| Engineering | 19 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 44 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,764,412
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#129
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,297
of 329,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.