↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale ecological networks do work in an ecologically complex biodiversity hotspot

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Large-scale ecological networks do work in an ecologically complex biodiversity hotspot
Published in
Ambio, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0697-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Samways, James S. Pryke

Abstract

Landscape-scale ecological networks (ENs) are interconnected conservation corridors of high-quality habitat used to mitigate the adverse effects of landscape fragmentation and to connect with protected areas. The effectiveness of ENs for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem function has been challenged. Here we show how an extensive system of ENs of remnant historic land was put in place at a large spatial scale (>0.5 million ha) in a plantation forestry context in a global biodiversity hotspot in southern Africa. These ENs can maintain indigenous and historic compositional and functional biodiversity, even in an area prone to the challenging effects of El Niño. Furthermore, ENs increase the effective size of local protected areas. Socio-ecological solutions and financial viability are also integrated as part of practical implementation of ENs. By adopting a retrospective analytical approach, biodiversity is maintained while also having productive forestry, making this a powerful agro-ecological approach on a large conservation-significant scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Other 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,131
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,858
of 270,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.