↓ Skip to main content

Long-term costs of introducing HPV-DNA post-treatment surveillance to national cervical cancer screening in Ireland

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term costs of introducing HPV-DNA post-treatment surveillance to national cervical cancer screening in Ireland
Published in
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1586/14737167.2015.1057126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Agapova, Andrea Duignan, Alan Smith, Ciaran O’Neill, Anirban Basu

Abstract

Co-testing (cytology plus human papillomavirus DNA testing) as part of cervical cancer surveillance in Ireland increases one-time testing costs. Of interest to policy makers was the long-term impact of these costs accompanied by decreases in intensity of recalls for women with no detected abnormalities. A cost analysis of cytology-only and co-testing strategy was implemented using decision analytic modeling, aggregating testing utilization and costs for each of the two strategies over 12 years. Aggregated incremental costs of the co-testing strategy were positive for the first 3 years but became negative thereafter, generating a cost savings of roughly €20 million in favor of the cytology-only strategy over a 12-year period. Results were robust over a range of sensitivity analyses with respect to discount and attrition rates. This analysis provided valuable information to policy makers contributing to the introduction of co-testing for post-treatment surveillance (PTS) in Ireland.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%